The legal basket.
The economic basket. The sociocultural basket. The human rights basket. Internet governance actors. The development basket.
IPv4 Available Pool. LIR Portal. Contact Registration Services.
Service and Security Announcements. About Us. Download View on SlideShare. As it stands now I have the right on any of my social networks to decide what to allow into the public domain for free and what I will charge for. Authors and creators need to be guaranteed the right to benefit from their moral and material rights of authorship as fair compensation for their contributions to society. There are copyright laws in effect for just this reason! There needs to be language to recognize intellectual property protection and the rule of law generally as key ingredients of sound Internet governance.
There is a need for deeper knowledge, understanding, and agreement of how principles are turned into policy and practice. There are also challenges that call for more than experiential learning, they call for focused efforts at greater understanding by all, in order to bring greater awareness and effectiveness to engagement.
Internet Governance Guide for Libraries
For meaningful participation stakeholders need collaboration and dialogue decide where and how, at which level, and in what governance venue, to best pursue policy and implementation of the endorsed principles. This effort to describe rights in the digital age in simple terms should anticipate and call for a more detailed elaboration of specific rights, their scope, limitations and exceptions, as well as prohibitions on their violation.
Given human rights have been so very grossly violated by mass surveillance, there are differences in the digital age because of what is now technically possible. Human Rights recognised in simple terms in the Universal Declaration needed to be fully explained in the Covenants, along with specific prohibitions on specific activities. The UN General Assembly resolution on the right to privacy in the digital age elaborated on the changed circumstances and challenges presented by the digital age, requesting a report from the High Commissioner.
We need modern and detailed agreements in light of the surveillance practices we now know have occurred and are ongoing. This document could anticipate and call for more than a general statement that rights online and offline should be respected. They are not being respected. Action is needed. The six rights listed under Human Rights in paragraph 2 do not reflect the consensus view of the submissions that were filed. The concept of intellectual property rights was raised in 28 separate submissions, in addition to a filing by 38 entertainment and cultural organizations, representing 66 countries and six continents.
Moreover, consumers use the Internet to access audio and audio-visual works more than any other application, so any outcome document intended to represent the views of all stakeholders needs to include the views of the global content community.
Introduction to Internet governance – Open Switch Africa
Free participation in cultural life, access to cultural goods, arts, scientific advancement are fundamental to even allow monetisation of said goods. A strong focus on IPR undermines the rights of the many for the rights of the few. It is important to recognize that these rights are not necessarily in conflict, Martin Fischer. Why must it be one or the other? Why is it not possible to compensate the authors fairly while also providing for wide distribution of their original expression of ideas? We must have a balance of both if we are to progress.
I agree with other comments recommending the inclusion of UDHR Article 27, paragraph 2 related to the right of authors to benefit from their moral and material interests. As an author of ebooks, my rights require that my copyright of my work is respected and protected.
This applies not only to ebooks but to music, plays or any other creataive endevor. One of the most important rights in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights has been omitted. That is Article 27 2 , guaranteeing authors and creators the right to benefit from their moral and material rights of authorship. This MUST be included. I have never understood why with the advent of the internet came an utter disregard for copyright and intellectual property rights. These rights did not change simply because the distribution method became electronic rather than on physical mediums.
We see many campaigns seeking to further eradicate the fundamental right of a creator to profit from, and control the use of his work under the banner of fostering creativity. This is not true. Those promoting an internet where copyright is utterly disregarded simply want to profit from the work of others without compensating them fairly for it. This is a criminal mindset and it needs to be discouraged.
It is vital that NETmundial work in every capacity to encourage the development of an internet that respects and protects the rights of creators, rather than working to eradicate them. Verizon welcomes the inclusion of human rights in these draft principles. Please address this issue in a prominent way. As a concerned professional photographer and educational media producer, I know that our copyright laws must be respected and enforced online as well as off-line if the professional creative community is to survive.
Article 27 2 of the UDHR protects the right of creators to the moral and material interests that result from their creative labors. These are central rights that states are accorded affirmative duties to protect. They are also central to many discussions of internet governance, and thus should be afforded prominence in the discussion on human rights here.
While all the principles listed below are fundamental policy goals, some of the principles do not appear in internationally accepted human rights instruments. Human rights are central values and universal as reflected in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and that should underpin Internet governance principles, with other shared values. Those rights and values include, but are not limited to:.
- Psychiatric Diagnosis.
- Introduction to Internet Governance?
- Account Options?
- Thinkers and Theories in Ethics!
The lack of copyright in this section is a rather glaring omission. There is no right to violate the rights of others, and that includes violating creators copyrights by distributing their work without permission. I would propose to add at the end of the list the human right to asylum as in art. Including this human right would only be logical if one looks at the images on top of Netmundials homepage showing Snowden, Manning and Assange.
Again, would being more expansive — mentioning the internet, but also including future technologies would be beneficial. Such technolgies would bring different problems IMHO. I agree with this view. I think its safer to have a clear point of contact being the Internet. I believe the statement will apply to whatever future technology that emerges so long as its using the Internet network as a medium. Respect for human rights on the Internet, including freedom of expression and privacy, is a basic principle. It is necessary to establish the law of restrictions, for example, for respect of the rights of other persons, and also a public order or moral of the population.
They have their soi-disant legal and cultural reasons to interfere in the information exchange.
The liberty should not be limited to expression only.